It seems impossible these days to have an hour or two at a time where someone doesn’t mention iPhone, Facebook, or Twitter. Indeed, these “Web 2.0” products certainly have gotten the attention of the media. We’ve embraced both Twitter and Facebook, and do quite a bit of video on sites like Youtube, but remain unconvinced about a dedicated iPhone application.
If history has taught us anything on desktop and laptop computers, it is that eventually most things migrate towards the web. The more simple the product or service, or the more it changes, the more likely a candidate it is to be a website, vs. an application. While products like Photoshop, and MS Office still remain applications and likely will for a long time, even our RezOvation GT is launching in an online form as an option for people who need that type of access. Remember the hundreds of AOL CDs that were mailed so you could run their applications for everything from specific content or access the web? Even companies like Sidestep started with an application that was downloaded to a computer and eventually gave up realizing it made more sense to be web-based.
But the iPhone craze has everyone thinking – mobile website or iPhone application? We’ve been monitoring developments on iPhones and on mobile websites now for some time, and we’ve come to the conclusion, like many other people, that an iPhone application in the travel space is of limited usage and appeal. Pinch Media has reported that just over 20% of iPhone application users return to use an application after the first day they use it, and 90 days after downloading, less than 5% of users actually return at any point to use it. Mobile apps with less than three million downloads had a repeat usage rate of less than 1% after 90 days. They reported these numbers to be similar for both free and paid applications. Clearly users are not glued to their applications, and when you consider how folks look for travel, it makes complete sense.
Let’s face it – if you have an iPhone, you probably also have at least one computer with internet connections. If you are planning to travel, it is highly unlikely that you would choose to use the iPhone when you can use a much larger and more powerful computer. We were not able to find data to support this, but logic would dictate that very few people plan a trip in advance on a device as small as an iPhone.
So when would someone use an iPhone for travel? In most studies, it is typically for last-minute information, as a GPS device, and/or as an itinerary and contact manager. For last-minute information, if you find yourself unexpectedly in need of a place to stay, and you are at an airport or in your car – an iPhone is an ideal tool. Similarly, using it as a GPS or itinerary manager are appropriate usages when you are already traveling. Knowing what those main usage cases are, it is possible to evaluate the usefulness of an iPhone application vs. a mobile website.
In the first use case, a mobile website clearly is a more useful tool. If travelers find themselves needing lodgings at the last minute while on the road – chances are that they did not, in advance, download an iPhone application. Even if they did, it would be highly unlikely to be a dedicated B&B application. It is also unlikely that at that last minute, they would first go to the iPhone App store, and look to purchase an application. A traveler is more likely to use his iPhone to go to a well known website or search engine to find nearby accommodations. Having a well-designed, easy-to-find mobile website would seem to have much more value than having an iPhone App in this scenario.
As for the GPS device usage case, a similar argument can be made. If you already know your destination, chances are you will either use a general mapping tool that has usefulness far outside the boundaries of just lodging. If not, it is unlikely that you will first spend the time to download an application when you can easily go to a well-known website or search engine rather than find an application. A similar argument could be made when using the iPhone as an itinerary or contact manager would likely stem from the email or calendar function of the iPhone. Links could be embedded from travel confirmations, content would embedded as well, and it is unlikely that someone would think to download an application in order to view those links. It would make sense to have those useful links you might need to access on the road go to a mobile website, rather than require an application to be downloaded in order to function. Again, having a mobile website wins out as the more useful tool.
Finally, there are other devices out there besides iPhones that really do matter. From the new Blackberry Storm, to the Nokia E71, to phones from Samsung and LG. iPhones get all the press, but they do not dominate the market - Blackberry still remains the leader and others are gaining ground. Mobile websites work across many, many devices and are not limited to just one brand. A well designed mobile website has the ability to reach a much greater market.
So what does all this mean for us as a B&B industry, and us at BedandBreakfast.com? First and foremost, B&B’s should do everything they can to optimize their own websites for mobile. If you can afford to have a dedicated mobile website, even better. Many websites and booking engines, like the websites of our RezOvation DHP customers and our RezOvation booking engines, work very well on most mobile phones already. If yours does not, it would be wise to look into ways to make it work for any last minute customers. At BedandBreakfast.com, our main website works extremely well on iPhones. Eventually we will release a mobile version that is even more optimized, but we are not in a rush to release an iPhone application. Given the limited use cases, and the trend of users downloading them and never using them, we think that a dedicated iPhone application in the B&B space is great at generating press and hype, but doesn’t do a lot to generate happy customers, or solve the real needs of those travelers who have a strong use case for a mobile website. We will continue to focus our efforts on generating more customers to B&Bs, and producing products that we feel have real-world appeal.
Tom Limongello of Mobile Marketer makes a good point about mobile apps in general – why not have both… “A mobile site offers infinitely more in terms of discoverability, monetization and current content that doesn’t depend on app upgrades, so why not have both site and app? The cost of deploying a mobile Web site is also much less than an iPhone application and it will immediately work on all Web-enabled phones.” Perhaps at some time BedandBreakfast.com will have both, but given the limited use case scenarios for our niche industry, putting all of our energy behind a great mobile site and making sure that people are aware of that site makes a lot more sense right now.